don't worry, normal programming to resume soon.
this is just a response i've written about sarah palin earmarking money for the state of alaska, which i read on
d's blog:
before i begin, i would like to point out that i have no desire to see sarah palin as our country's vp--i have been excited about obama for months. nor do i agree with her earmarking* of money for wasilla ($500,000 for a youth center? that's not a bit excessive? i'd like to see the full list, and how much the city put in, if any), and definitely not the
bridge to nowhere**. nor am i an expert on government or finances. if i were, i'd have far more money. i just get stuck on the part about her earmarking money for the state.
based on my experience and knowledge of alaska, a lot of the $198 million earmarked for the state would go to genuinely useful programs. rural sanitation probably does not need to be discussed, as it's a pretty self-explanatory. (do you want to try digging a septic system into the permafrost?) there are many programs having to do with fisheries which is a main industry in alaska, following oil drilling, and along with tourism. they've learned what overfishing can do, and have, from what i have seen, been doing a good job of regulating the industry in recent years, and i hope that they continue to do so. i would certainly support any efforts to be made to keep things that way, and to find newer and better ways to run a sustainable source of income for the state. along with that were programs like DARE, and things dealing with drugs and alcohol. a problem anywhere, they definitely have issues with it. a number of places have outlawed the import of alcohol altogether because of the effect it has had.
another note: according to wikipedia, "Federal subsidies are also an important part of the economy, allowing the state to keep taxes low." i should have a problem with this, because they do have such a huge income from oil. it funds a lot of state programs, including the permanent dividend fund. each alaskan resident, last year, received $1654. on the other hand, the per capita income from alaska in 2006 was $26,919 (higher than most states, also with a much higher unemployment rate than nationally), but consider the high cost of living in most rural communities: while living in naknek, i rarely saw fresh fruit or vegetables at the cannery, and the cost of those in the grocery store were, for example, between $2.50-$3.00 for a pound of bananas. the cost of other necessary items, like shampoo, is astounding in a place like that. i'm not even sure what housing costs. so $1600 can make a huge difference in the income for many alaskans. (a round trip plane ticket from king salmon to anchorage, the nearest major shopping center? at the moment, about $500 on travelocity.) you can see why a huge number of alaskans are for continuing with oil, and opening up anwr. that check, it's not just a plane ticket out of town, but an important source of income for some.
a lot of people seem to comment on that being a lot of money for so few people, but alaska being so VAST and so much of it being undeveloped/without infrastructure, and fewer natural resources/sources of income, it's not exactly a black and white issue. i think sarah palin is a hypocrite for calling herself a reformer and i don't agree with all of her decisions, but i can understand why she made them. and so going back to earmarking (and really in quite a lot of topics), i don't think that we can talk about alaska in the same way that we talk about other parts of the country.
i guess in the end, that is my point: politics as with many topics is a complicated issue to begin with, and we never really can see every point of view. especially in a country like the u.s., which being so large makes everything even more so. and it all gives me a headache. and i'm glad i'm not her daughter, how humiliated she must feel.
*in general i think the way earmarking is done is a crappy way to get money for programs, and that does need to change. but the end result is what i'm trying to focus on here.
**in talking about, some writers fail to omit the part about the airport being there, just a population of 50, making it sound even more laughable. *giggles*
info from:
addendum: i also cringed when i read
jezebel calling palin a "moose murderer". um...a lot of alaskans hunt moose. as an affordable source of food. a moose can provide nearly all of the meat for a family for quite some time. i really just wish people would not make accusatory statements without a little basic research. although when i read about her being for hunting wolves by helicopter? that's not so much okay by me.